GDQ SPECIAL REPORT: He got the wrong guy
Wouldn't you know it! Finally(!) someone takes it upon themselves to deal out some much needed justice. In the form of a bullet. One Steven A Marshall, according to REASON magazine (Aug, 06), decided he'd had enough, so he loaded up the guns and ammo and headed off to relive the glorious days of an- eye-for-an-eye type justice for the perpretrators of "sex crimes." Unfortunately, however, the idiot evidently didn't bother checking the facts. While REASON magazine didn't bother reporting the crime of the second victim, the first, one William Elliot, was considered a "sex offender" because of the crime of having sex with a fifteen year-old girl. Consensual sex, that is. How old was the old lecher who defiled this sweet young virgin? A decrepitly ancient....19. And, by the way, she was two weeks shy of her 16th.
Did poor William do a stupid thing (by getting caught) having sex with a minor? Yes. Absolutely. Did he deserve the death penalty? No. Absolutely not.
Why, oh why, do the idiots have to make headlines, and use a gun to make matters worse? My guess is the little dumbshit was either A) a victim of a sex offender himself, or B) a victim of a sex offender himself.
The moral of this story? Do your homework. Don't make things difficult for the rest of us by going and whacking some poor horny kid.
Keep your head down,
Jefferson
Did poor William do a stupid thing (by getting caught) having sex with a minor? Yes. Absolutely. Did he deserve the death penalty? No. Absolutely not.
Why, oh why, do the idiots have to make headlines, and use a gun to make matters worse? My guess is the little dumbshit was either A) a victim of a sex offender himself, or B) a victim of a sex offender himself.
The moral of this story? Do your homework. Don't make things difficult for the rest of us by going and whacking some poor horny kid.
Keep your head down,
Jefferson

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home